| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha : |
06/07/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
08/07/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
SOUZA CONGIO, G. F. DE; BANNINK, A.; MAYORGA, MOGOLLÓN, O. L.; NICOLOV HRISTOV, A.; JAURENA, G.; GONDA, H.; GERE, J. I.; CERÓN-CUCCHI, M.E.; ORTIZ-CHURA, A.; TIERI, M.P.; HERNÁNDEZ, O.; RICCI, P.; JULIARENA, M.P.; LOMBARDI, B.; ABDALLA, A.L.; ABDALLA-FILHO, A.L.; BERNDT, A.; ANCHAO OLIVEIRA, P. P.; HENRIQUE, F. L.; GOMEZ MONTEIRO, A.L.; BORGES, L. I.; RIBEIRO-FILHO, H.M.N.; RIBEIRO PEREIRA, L.G.; RIBEIRO TOMICH, T.; MAGALHAES CAMPOS, M.; SAMARINI MACHADO, F.; MARCONDES, M. I.; ZERLOTTI MERCADANTE, M. E.; SANNOMIYA SAKAMOTO, L.; GALVAO ALBUQUERQUE, L.; FACCIO CARVALHO, P. C. DE; ROSSETTO, J.; SAVIAN, J.V.; MAZZA RODRIGUES, P. H.; PERNA JÚNIOR, F.; MOREIRA, T.S.; MAURÍCIO, R. M.; PACHECO RODRIGUES, J.P.; CRUZ BORGES, A.L. DA C.; REIS E SILVA, R.; FERREIRA LAGE, H.; ANDRADE REIS, R.; RUGGIERI, A.C.; CARDOSO, A. DA SILVA; SILVA, S. CARNEIRO DA; BARBOSA CHIAVEGATO, M.; VALADARES-FILHO, S. DE CAMPOS; SILVA, F. A. DE SALES; ZANETTI, D.; BERCHIELLI, T.T.; DUARTE MESSANA, J.; MUÑOZ, C.; ARIZA-NIETO, C.J.; SIERRA-ALARCÓN, L.I.; GUALDRÓN-DUARTE, L.B.; MESTRA-VARGAS, L.I.; MOLINA-BOTERO, I. C.; BARAHONA-ROSALES, R.; ARANGO, J.; GAVIRIA-URIBE, X.; GIRALDO VALDERRAMA, L.A.; ROSERO-NOGUERA, J.R.; POSADA-OCHOA, S.L.; ABARCA-MONGE, SERGIO; SOTO-BLANCO, R.; KU-VERA, J.C.; JIMÉNEZ-OCAMPO, R.; FLORES-SANTIAGO, E. DEL J.; CASTELÁN-ORTEGA, O.A.; VÁZQUEZ-CARRILLO, M.F.; BENAOUDA, M.; GÓMEZ-BRAVO, C. A.; ALVARADO BOLOVICH, V.I.; DÍAZ CÉSPEDES, M.A.; ASTIGARRAGA, L. |
|
Afiliación : |
GUILHERMO FRANCKLIN DE SOUZA CONGIO, Colombian Corporation for Agricultural Research, AGROSAVIA, Colombia. // Department of Animal Science, Piracicaba, SP. Brazil.; ANDRÉ BANNINK, Wageningen Livestock Research, Wageningen University & Research, The Netherlands.; OLGA LUCÍA MAYORGA MOGOLLÓN; ALEXANDER NIKOLOV HRISTOV, Department of Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, USA.; GUSTAVO JAURENA, Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agronomy, University of Buenos Aires (UBA), Argentina; HORACIO GONDA, Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.; JOSÉ IGNACIO GERE, Regional Faculty of Buenos Aires, National Technological University (UTN) Buenos Aires, Argentina. // National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; MARÍA ESPERANZA CERÓN-CUCCHI, Institute of Pathobiology, National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA) (INTA-CONICET) Buenos Aires, Argentina; ABUNAEK IRTÑUZ.CHURA, Institute of Pathobiology, National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA) (INTA-CONICET) Buenos Aires, Argentina; MARÍA PAZ TIERI, Dairy Value Chain Research Institute (IDICAL) (INTA-CONICET), Rafaela, Argentina // Regional Faculty of Rafaela,UTN, Rafaela, Argentina.; OLEGARIO HERNÁNDEZ, INTA, Santiago del Estero, Argentina; PATRICIA RICCI, National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.// Institute of Innovation for Agri-Livestock Production and Sustainable Develpment, INTA, Balcarce, Argentina; MARIA PAULA JULIARENA, National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina. // Phisics and Engineering Research Centre, National University of the Centre of the Buenos Aires Province (UNCPBA), Tandil, Argentina.; BANIRA LOMBARDI, National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina. // Phisics and Engineering Research Centre, National University of the Centre of the Buenos Aires Province (UNCPBA), Tandil, Argentina.; ADIBE LUIZ ABDALLA, Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Centre for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture (CENA), University fo Sao Paulo (USP), Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.; ADIBE LUIZ ABDALLA-FILHO, Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Centre for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture (CENA), University fo Sao Paulo (USP), Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.; ALEXANDRE BERNDT, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa) Southeast Livestock, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil.; PATRICIA PERONDI ANCHAO OLIVEIRA, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa) Southeast Livestock, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil.; FÁBIO LUIS HENRIQUE, Associated Colleges of Uberaba (FAZU), Uberaba, MG, Brazil.; ALDA LÚCIA GOMEZ MONTEIRO, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Paraná, (UFPR), Curitiba. PR, Brazil.; LUIZA ILHA BORGES, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Paraná, (UFPR), Curitiba. PR, Brazil.; HENRIQUE MENDOCA NUNES RIBEIRO-FILHO, Department of Animal and Food Science, Santa Catarina State University (udesc), Lages, SC, Brazil.; LUIS GUSTAVO RIBEIRO PEREIRA, Embrapa Dairy Cattle, M.G, Brazil; THIERRY RIBEIRO TOMICH, Embrapa Dairy Cattle, M.G, Brazil; MARIANA MAGALHAES CAMPOS, Embrapa Dairy Cattle, M.G, Brazil; FERNANDA SAMARINI MACHADO, Embrapa Dairy Cattle, M.G, Brazil; MARCOS INÁCIO MARCONDES, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Vicosa (UFV), Vicosa, MG, Brazil.; MARIA EUGENIA ZERLOTTI MERCADANTE, Institute of Animal Science (IZ) Sao Paulo Agribusiness Technology Agency (APTA), SP, Brazil.; LEANDRO SANNOMIYA SAKAMOTO, Institute of Animal Science (IZ) Sao Paulo Agribusiness Technology Agency (APTA), SP, Brazil.; LUCÍA GALVAO ALBUQUERQUE, Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (FCAV), Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.; PAULO CÉSAR DE FACCIO CARVALHO, Grazing Ecology Research Group, Department of Forage Plants and Agrometeorology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.; JULIANE ROSSETTO, Grazing Ecology Research Group, Department of Forage Plants and Agrometeorology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.; JEAN VICTOR SAVIAN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. // Grazing Ecology Research Group, Department of Forage Plants and Agrometeorology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.; PAULO HENRIQUE MAZZA RODRIGUES, Department of Animal Nutrition and Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ), USP, Pirassuninga, SP, Brazil.; FLAVIO PERNA JÚNIOR, Department of Animal Nutrition and Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ), USP, Pirassuninga, SP, Brazil.; TAINÁ SILVESTRE MOREIRA, Department of Animal Nutrition and Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ), USP, Pirassuninga, SP, Brazil.// Department of Bioengineering, Federal University of Sao Joao del Rei (UFSJ), MG, Brazil.; ROGÉLIO MARTINS MAURÍCIO, Department of Bioengineering, Federal University of Sao Joao del Rei (UFSJ), MG, Brazil.; JOAO PAULO PACHECO RODRIGUES, Faculty of Animal Science, Federal University of Southern and Southeastern Pará (UNIFESSPA), PA, Brazil.; ANA LUIZA DA COSTA CRUZ BORGES, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.; RICARDO REIS E SILVA, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.; HELENA FERREIRA LAGE, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Newton Paiva University, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.; RICARDO ANDRADE REIS, Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (FCAV), Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.; ANA CLAUDIA RUGGIERI, Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (FCAV), Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.; ABNAEK DA SILVA CARDOSO, Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (FCAV), Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.; SILA CARNEIRO DA SILVA, Department of Animal Science, Piracicaba, SP. Brazil.; MARÍLIA BARBOSA CHIAVEGATO, Department of Horticulture & Crop Science and Animal Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.; SEBASTIAO DE CAMPOS VALADARES-FILHO, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Vicosa (UFV), Vicosa, MG, Brazil.; FLÁVIA ADRIANE DE SALES SILVA, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Vicosa (UFV), Vicosa, MG, Brazil.; DIEGO ZANETTI, Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Southern Minas Gerais,MG, Brazil.; TELMA TERESINHA BERCHIELLI, Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (FCAV), Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.; JULIANA DUARTE MESSANA, Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (FCAV), Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.; CAMILA MUÑOZ, Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIA Remehue, Osorno, Chile.; CLAUDIA JANETH ARIZA-NIETO, Centro de Investigación Tibaitatá de AGROSAVIA, Colombia; LORENA INÉS SIERRA-ALARCÓN, Centro de Investigación Tibaitatá de AGROSAVIA, Colombia; LAURA BIBIANA GUALDRÓN-DUARTE, AGROSAVIA, Turipaná, Cereté, Colombia.; LORENA INÉS MESTRA-VARGAS, AGROSAVIA, Turipaná, Cereté, Colombia.; ISABEL CRISTINA MOLINA-BOTERO, Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Animal Science, National Agrarian University La Molina (UNALM), Lima, Perú.; ROLANDO BARAHONA-ROSALES, Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, National University of Colombia (UNAL), Medellín, Colombia.; JACOBO ARANGO, International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.; XIOMARA GAVIRIA-URIBE, Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, National University of Colombia (UNAL), Medellín, Colombia. //International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.; LUIS ALFONSO GIRALDO VALDERRAMA, Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, National University of Colombia, (UNAL), Medellín, Colombia.; JAIME RICARDO ROSERO-NOGUERA, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Antioquia (UdeA), Medellín, Colombia.; SANDRA LUCÍA POSADA-OCHOA, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Antioquia (UdeA), Medellín, Colombia.; SERGIO ABARCA-MONGE, National Institute of Innovation and Agricultual Technology Transfer (INTA), Turrialba, Costa Rica.; ROBERTO SOTO-BLANCO, National Institute of Innovation and Agricultual Technology Transfer (INTA), Turrialba, Costa Rica.; JUAN CARLOS KU-VERA, Laboratory of Climate Change and Livestock Production, Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of Yucatan (UADY), Mérida, Yucatán, México; RAFAEL JIMÉNEZ-OCAMPO, Laboratory of Climate Change and Livestock Production, Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of Yucatan (UADY), Mérida, Yucatán, México. // National Institute for Forestry, Agriculture and Livestock; EVER DEL JESUS FLORES-SANTIAGO, Laboratory of Climate Change and Livestock Production, Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of Yucatan (UADY), Mérida, Yucatán, México. Chapingo Autonomous University, (URUSSE), Mexico; OCTAVIO ALONSO CASTELÁN-ORTEGA, Laboratory of Livestock, Environment and Renewabel Energies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Autonumous University Of the State of Mexico (UAEMex), México.; MARÍA FERNANDA VÁZQUEZ-CARRILLO, Laboratory of Livestock, Environment and Renewabel Energies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Autonumous University Of the State of Mexico (UAEMex), México.; MOHAMMED BENAOUDA, UMR1213 Herbivores, French National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food, and Environment (INRAE), France. // AgroSup Dijon, Dijon, France.; CARLOS ALFREDO GÓMEZ-BRAVO, Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Animal Science, National Agrarian University La Molina (UNALM), Lima, Perú.; VICTOR ILICH ALVARADO BOLOVICH, Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Animal Science, National Agrarian University La Molina (UNALM), Lima, Perú.; MEDARDO ANTONIO DÍAZ CÉSPEDES, Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Animal Science, National Agrarian University La Molina (UNALM), Lima, Perú.; LAURA ASTIGARRAGA, Department of Animal Science and Pasture, Faculty of Agronomy, University of the Republic of Uruguay (UdelaR), Montevideo, Uruguay. //Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agronomy, University of Buenos Aires (UBA), Argentina. |
|
Título : |
Enteric methane mitigation strategies for ruminant livestock systems in the Latin America and Caribbean region: a meta-analysis. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021. v. 312, art. 127693, 13 p. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127693 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127693 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Receiived 22 December 2020; Received in revised form 24 April 2021; Accepted 25 May 2021. Available online 30 May 2021.
Latin America Methane Project Collaborators está integrada por 71 investigadores en este artículo. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract: Latin America and Caribbean (LAC) is a developing region characterized for its importance for global food security,
producing 23 and 11% of the global beef and milk production, respectively. The region?s ruminant livestock sector however, is under scrutiny on environmental grounds due to its large contribution to enteric methane (CH4) emissions and influence on global climate change. Thus, the identification of effective CH4 mitigation strategies which do not compromise animal performance is urgently needed, especially in context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) defined in the Paris Agreement of the United Nations. Therefore, the objectives of the current study were to: 1) collate a database of individual sheep, beef and dairy cattle records from enteric CH4 emission studies conducted in the LAC region, and 2) perform a meta-analysis to identify feasible enteric CH4 mitigation strategies, which do not compromise animal performance. After outlier?s removal, 2745 animal records (65% of the original data) from 103 studies were retained (from 2011 to 2021) in the LAC database. Potential mitigation strategies were classified into three main categories (i.e., animal breeding, dietary, and rumen manipulation) and up to three subcategories, totaling 34 evaluated strategies. A random effects model weighted by inverse variance was used (Comprehensive Meta-Analysis V3.3.070). Six strategies decreased at least one enteric CH4 metric and simultaneously increased milk yield (MY; dairy cattle) or average daily gain (ADG; beef cattle and sheep). The breed composition F1 Holstein ×Gyr decreased CH4 emission per MY (CH4IMilk) while increasing MY by 99%. Adequate strategies of grazing management under continuous and rotational stocking decreased CH4 emission per ADG (CH4IGain) by 22 and 35%, while increasing ADG by 22 and 71%, respectively. Increased dietary protein concentration, and increased concentrate level through cottonseed meal inclusion, decreased CH4IMilk and CH4IGain by 10 and 20% and increased MY and ADG by 12 and 31%, respectively. Lastly, increased feeding level decreased CH4IGain by 37%, while increasing ADG by 171%. The identified effective mitigation strategies can be adopted by livestock producers according to their specific needs and aid LAC countries in achieving SDG as defined in the Paris Agreement. MenosAbstract: Latin America and Caribbean (LAC) is a developing region characterized for its importance for global food security,
producing 23 and 11% of the global beef and milk production, respectively. The region?s ruminant livestock sector however, is under scrutiny on environmental grounds due to its large contribution to enteric methane (CH4) emissions and influence on global climate change. Thus, the identification of effective CH4 mitigation strategies which do not compromise animal performance is urgently needed, especially in context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) defined in the Paris Agreement of the United Nations. Therefore, the objectives of the current study were to: 1) collate a database of individual sheep, beef and dairy cattle records from enteric CH4 emission studies conducted in the LAC region, and 2) perform a meta-analysis to identify feasible enteric CH4 mitigation strategies, which do not compromise animal performance. After outlier?s removal, 2745 animal records (65% of the original data) from 103 studies were retained (from 2011 to 2021) in the LAC database. Potential mitigation strategies were classified into three main categories (i.e., animal breeding, dietary, and rumen manipulation) and up to three subcategories, totaling 34 evaluated strategies. A random effects model weighted by inverse variance was used (Comprehensive Meta-Analysis V3.3.070). Six strategies decreased at least one enteric CH4 metric and simultaneously increased milk ... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
CATTLE; ENTERIC METHANE; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS; MITIGATION; SHEPP. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
P01 Conservación de la naturaleza y recursos de La tierra |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/15802/1/Journal-Cleaner-Production-2021.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 05911naa a2201105 a 4500
001 1062273
005 2021-07-08
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127693$2DOI
100 1 $aSOUZA CONGIO, G. F. DE
245 $aEnteric methane mitigation strategies for ruminant livestock systems in the Latin America and Caribbean region$ba meta-analysis.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aArticle history: Receiived 22 December 2020; Received in revised form 24 April 2021; Accepted 25 May 2021. Available online 30 May 2021. Latin America Methane Project Collaborators está integrada por 71 investigadores en este artículo.
520 $aAbstract: Latin America and Caribbean (LAC) is a developing region characterized for its importance for global food security, producing 23 and 11% of the global beef and milk production, respectively. The region?s ruminant livestock sector however, is under scrutiny on environmental grounds due to its large contribution to enteric methane (CH4) emissions and influence on global climate change. Thus, the identification of effective CH4 mitigation strategies which do not compromise animal performance is urgently needed, especially in context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) defined in the Paris Agreement of the United Nations. Therefore, the objectives of the current study were to: 1) collate a database of individual sheep, beef and dairy cattle records from enteric CH4 emission studies conducted in the LAC region, and 2) perform a meta-analysis to identify feasible enteric CH4 mitigation strategies, which do not compromise animal performance. After outlier?s removal, 2745 animal records (65% of the original data) from 103 studies were retained (from 2011 to 2021) in the LAC database. Potential mitigation strategies were classified into three main categories (i.e., animal breeding, dietary, and rumen manipulation) and up to three subcategories, totaling 34 evaluated strategies. A random effects model weighted by inverse variance was used (Comprehensive Meta-Analysis V3.3.070). Six strategies decreased at least one enteric CH4 metric and simultaneously increased milk yield (MY; dairy cattle) or average daily gain (ADG; beef cattle and sheep). The breed composition F1 Holstein ×Gyr decreased CH4 emission per MY (CH4IMilk) while increasing MY by 99%. Adequate strategies of grazing management under continuous and rotational stocking decreased CH4 emission per ADG (CH4IGain) by 22 and 35%, while increasing ADG by 22 and 71%, respectively. Increased dietary protein concentration, and increased concentrate level through cottonseed meal inclusion, decreased CH4IMilk and CH4IGain by 10 and 20% and increased MY and ADG by 12 and 31%, respectively. Lastly, increased feeding level decreased CH4IGain by 37%, while increasing ADG by 171%. The identified effective mitigation strategies can be adopted by livestock producers according to their specific needs and aid LAC countries in achieving SDG as defined in the Paris Agreement.
653 $aCATTLE
653 $aENTERIC METHANE
653 $aGLOBAL WARMING
653 $aGREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
653 $aMITIGATION
653 $aSHEPP
700 1 $aBANNINK, A.
700 1 $aMAYORGA, MOGOLLÓN, O. L.
700 1 $aNICOLOV HRISTOV, A.
700 1 $aJAURENA, G.
700 1 $aGONDA, H.
700 1 $aGERE, J. I.
700 1 $aCERÓN-CUCCHI, M.E.
700 1 $aORTIZ-CHURA, A.
700 1 $aTIERI, M.P.
700 1 $aHERNÁNDEZ, O.
700 1 $aRICCI, P.
700 1 $aJULIARENA, M.P.
700 1 $aLOMBARDI, B.
700 1 $aABDALLA, A.L.
700 1 $aABDALLA-FILHO, A.L.
700 1 $aBERNDT, A.
700 1 $aANCHAO OLIVEIRA, P. P.
700 1 $aHENRIQUE, F. L.
700 1 $aGOMEZ MONTEIRO, A.L.
700 1 $aBORGES, L. I.
700 1 $aRIBEIRO-FILHO, H.M.N.
700 1 $aRIBEIRO PEREIRA, L.G.
700 1 $aRIBEIRO TOMICH, T.
700 1 $aMAGALHAES CAMPOS, M.
700 1 $aSAMARINI MACHADO, F.
700 1 $aMARCONDES, M. I.
700 1 $aZERLOTTI MERCADANTE, M. E.
700 1 $aSANNOMIYA SAKAMOTO, L.
700 1 $aGALVAO ALBUQUERQUE, L.
700 1 $aFACCIO CARVALHO, P. C. DE
700 1 $aROSSETTO, J.
700 1 $aSAVIAN, J.V.
700 1 $aMAZZA RODRIGUES, P. H.
700 1 $aPERNA JÚNIOR, F.
700 1 $aMOREIRA, T.S.
700 1 $aMAURÍCIO, R. M.
700 1 $aPACHECO RODRIGUES, J.P.
700 1 $aCRUZ BORGES, A.L. DA C.
700 1 $aREIS E SILVA, R.
700 1 $aFERREIRA LAGE, H.
700 1 $aANDRADE REIS, R.
700 1 $aRUGGIERI, A.C.
700 1 $aCARDOSO, A. DA SILVA
700 1 $aSILVA, S. CARNEIRO DA
700 1 $aBARBOSA CHIAVEGATO, M.
700 1 $aVALADARES-FILHO, S. DE CAMPOS
700 1 $aSILVA, F. A. DE SALES
700 1 $aZANETTI, D.
700 1 $aBERCHIELLI, T.T.
700 1 $aDUARTE MESSANA, J.
700 1 $aMUÑOZ, C.
700 1 $aARIZA-NIETO, C.J.
700 1 $aSIERRA-ALARCÓN, L.I.
700 1 $aGUALDRÓN-DUARTE, L.B.
700 1 $aMESTRA-VARGAS, L.I.
700 1 $aMOLINA-BOTERO, I. C.
700 1 $aBARAHONA-ROSALES, R.
700 1 $aARANGO, J.
700 1 $aGAVIRIA-URIBE, X.
700 1 $aGIRALDO VALDERRAMA, L.A.
700 1 $aROSERO-NOGUERA, J.R.
700 1 $aPOSADA-OCHOA, S.L.
700 1 $aABARCA-MONGE, SERGIO
700 1 $aSOTO-BLANCO, R.
700 1 $aKU-VERA, J.C.
700 1 $aJIMÉNEZ-OCAMPO, R.
700 1 $aFLORES-SANTIAGO, E. DEL J.
700 1 $aCASTELÁN-ORTEGA, O.A.
700 1 $aVÁZQUEZ-CARRILLO, M.F.
700 1 $aBENAOUDA, M.
700 1 $aGÓMEZ-BRAVO, C. A.
700 1 $aALVARADO BOLOVICH, V.I.
700 1 $aDÍAZ CÉSPEDES, M.A.
700 1 $aASTIGARRAGA, L.
773 $tJournal of Cleaner Production. 2021.$gv. 312, art. 127693, 13 p. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127693
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
24/07/2023 |
|
Actualizado : |
24/07/2023 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Nacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Nacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
FEDRIGO, J.K.; BENÍTEZ, V.; SANTA CRUZ, R.; POSSE, J.P.; BARRO, R.; HERNÁNDEZ, J.; MANTERO, C.; MORALES OLMOS, V.; SILVEIRA, E.D.; VIÑOLES, C. |
|
Afiliación : |
JEAN KÁSSIO FEDRIGO, PDU Agroforestal, Casa de la Universidad de Cerro Largo, UdelaR, Ruta 26, km408, Bañados de Medina, Cerro Largo, Uruguay.; VALENTINA BENÍTEZ, PDU Agroforestal, Casa de la Universidad de Cerro Largo, UdelaR, Ruta 26, km408, Bañados de Medina, Cerro Largo, Uruguay.; RODRIGO SANTA CRUZ, PDU Agroforestal, Casa de la Universidad de Cerro Largo, UdelaR, Ruta 26, km408, Bañados de Medina, Cerro Largo, Uruguay.; JUAN PEDRO POSSE, Centro Universitario de Tacuarembó, UdelaR.; RAQUEL SANTIAGO BARRO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JORGE HERNÁNDEZ, Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; CARLOS MANTERO, Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; VIRGINIA MORALES OLMOS, Centro Universitario de Tacuarembó, UdelaR.; EDISON DAVID SILVEIRA, Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; CAROLINA VIÑOLES GIL, PDU Agroforestal, Casa de la Universidad de Cerro Largo, UdelaR, Ruta 26, km408, Bañados de Medina, Cerro Largo, Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Oportunidades y desafíos para los sistemas silvopastoriles en Uruguay. [Oportunities and challenges for the silvopastoral systems in Uruguay.] |
|
Complemento del título : |
Sección: Revisión. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Veterinaria (Montevideo), 2018, v. 54, no. 209, p. 20-33. -- OPEN ACCESS. |
|
ISSN : |
0376-4362 (impresa); 1688-4809 (en línea). |
|
DOI : |
10.29155/VET.54.209.4 |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Recibido 11 Enero 2018; Aceptado 27 Marzo 2018; Publicado 1 Mayo 2018. -- Autor para correspondencia: jean.fedrigo@poloagroforestal.edu.uy -- Publicación de la Sociedad de Medicina Veterinaria del Uruguay (SMVU). |
|
Contenido : |
RESUMEN.- Los sistemas silvopastoriles constituyen una modalidad de sistemas agroforestales basada en la producción integrada entre árboles,
plantas forrajeras y rumiantes. Cuando estos sistemas son bien planeados y conducidos, permiten explotar las sinergias entre los componentes, proporcionando ventajas económicas, para el bienestar animal y la prestación de servicios ambientales. La presencia de cubiertas arbóreas aumenta la humedad y posibilita una menor amplitud de variación térmica tanto del aire como del suelo, condiciones que mejoran el microclima para el crecimiento de plantas forrajeras y animales. La mayoría de los cultivos arbóreos establecidos en Uruguay son de alta densidad y destinados
prioritariamente para la producción de pulpa o madera para aserrío, condiciones que restringen la cantidad y calidad de radiación fotosintéticamente activa disponible para el sotobosque. De esa manera, no ocurre una satisfactoria producción de forraje a lo largo de los años, aspecto que determina que la integración con la ganadería sea temporaria. El objetivo de esta revisión es presentar el conocimiento generado en los sistemas silvopastoriles que se han establecido en Uruguay, sus aspectos críticos, experiencias internacionales y las oportunidades y desafíos para la investigación y transferencia de tecnología en Uruguay. Destacamos la necesidad de creación de sistemas planeados en forma conjunta con los destinatarios de esta tecnología y otras instituciones de investigación, fomento y desarrollo, para evaluar los diferentes componentes y sus interacciones en el largo plazo, además de determinar su impacto productivo y económico, valorando adecuadamente los posibles servicios ambientales. ------------------------------ SUMMARY.- Silvopastoral systems constitute a modality of agroforestry based on the integrated production between trees, forage plants and ruminants. When these systems are well planned and conducted, they allow to exploit the synergies between its components, providing economic benefits, better animal welfare and the provision of environmental services. The presence of tree covers increases humidity and allows a smaller thermal variation of both air and soil, conditions that improve the microclimate for the growth of forage plants and animals. Most of the tree crops established in Uruguay are constituted by high density plantations, destined for pulp or solid wood production,
conditions that restrict the quantity and quality of photosynthetically active radiation available for the understory environment. Therefore, there is no satisfactory forage production over the years, which determines that the system integration with livestock be only temporary. The objective of this review is to present the knowledge generated in silvopastoral systems that have been established in Uruguay, its critical aspects, international
experiences and the opportunities and challenges for research and technology transfer in our country. We highlight the need to create systems planned jointly with the recipients of this technology and other research and development institutions, in order to evaluate the different components and their interactions in the long term, as well as to determine their productive and economic impact at farm and region scale, and properly assessing the environmental impacts. MenosRESUMEN.- Los sistemas silvopastoriles constituyen una modalidad de sistemas agroforestales basada en la producción integrada entre árboles,
plantas forrajeras y rumiantes. Cuando estos sistemas son bien planeados y conducidos, permiten explotar las sinergias entre los componentes, proporcionando ventajas económicas, para el bienestar animal y la prestación de servicios ambientales. La presencia de cubiertas arbóreas aumenta la humedad y posibilita una menor amplitud de variación térmica tanto del aire como del suelo, condiciones que mejoran el microclima para el crecimiento de plantas forrajeras y animales. La mayoría de los cultivos arbóreos establecidos en Uruguay son de alta densidad y destinados
prioritariamente para la producción de pulpa o madera para aserrío, condiciones que restringen la cantidad y calidad de radiación fotosintéticamente activa disponible para el sotobosque. De esa manera, no ocurre una satisfactoria producción de forraje a lo largo de los años, aspecto que determina que la integración con la ganadería sea temporaria. El objetivo de esta revisión es presentar el conocimiento generado en los sistemas silvopastoriles que se han establecido en Uruguay, sus aspectos críticos, experiencias internacionales y las oportunidades y desafíos para la investigación y transferencia de tecnología en Uruguay. Destacamos la necesidad de creación de sistemas planeados en forma conjunta con los destinatarios de esta tecnología y otras instituciones de investigación, f... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Animal welfare; Ecosystem services; Integrated systems; Profitability; Rentabilidad; Servicios ecosistémicos; Sinergias; Sistemas integrados; Synergy. |
|
Thesagro : |
BIENESTAR ANIMAL. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/17303/1/Fedrigo-et-al.-2018-SMVU-v54-n209.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 04774naa a2200385 a 4500
001 1064268
005 2023-07-24
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0376-4362 (impresa); 1688-4809 (en línea).
024 7 $a10.29155/VET.54.209.4$2DOI
100 1 $aFEDRIGO, J.K.
245 $aOportunidades y desafíos para los sistemas silvopastoriles en Uruguay. [Oportunities and challenges for the silvopastoral systems in Uruguay.]$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
500 $aArticle history: Recibido 11 Enero 2018; Aceptado 27 Marzo 2018; Publicado 1 Mayo 2018. -- Autor para correspondencia: jean.fedrigo@poloagroforestal.edu.uy -- Publicación de la Sociedad de Medicina Veterinaria del Uruguay (SMVU).
520 $aRESUMEN.- Los sistemas silvopastoriles constituyen una modalidad de sistemas agroforestales basada en la producción integrada entre árboles, plantas forrajeras y rumiantes. Cuando estos sistemas son bien planeados y conducidos, permiten explotar las sinergias entre los componentes, proporcionando ventajas económicas, para el bienestar animal y la prestación de servicios ambientales. La presencia de cubiertas arbóreas aumenta la humedad y posibilita una menor amplitud de variación térmica tanto del aire como del suelo, condiciones que mejoran el microclima para el crecimiento de plantas forrajeras y animales. La mayoría de los cultivos arbóreos establecidos en Uruguay son de alta densidad y destinados prioritariamente para la producción de pulpa o madera para aserrío, condiciones que restringen la cantidad y calidad de radiación fotosintéticamente activa disponible para el sotobosque. De esa manera, no ocurre una satisfactoria producción de forraje a lo largo de los años, aspecto que determina que la integración con la ganadería sea temporaria. El objetivo de esta revisión es presentar el conocimiento generado en los sistemas silvopastoriles que se han establecido en Uruguay, sus aspectos críticos, experiencias internacionales y las oportunidades y desafíos para la investigación y transferencia de tecnología en Uruguay. Destacamos la necesidad de creación de sistemas planeados en forma conjunta con los destinatarios de esta tecnología y otras instituciones de investigación, fomento y desarrollo, para evaluar los diferentes componentes y sus interacciones en el largo plazo, además de determinar su impacto productivo y económico, valorando adecuadamente los posibles servicios ambientales. ------------------------------ SUMMARY.- Silvopastoral systems constitute a modality of agroforestry based on the integrated production between trees, forage plants and ruminants. When these systems are well planned and conducted, they allow to exploit the synergies between its components, providing economic benefits, better animal welfare and the provision of environmental services. The presence of tree covers increases humidity and allows a smaller thermal variation of both air and soil, conditions that improve the microclimate for the growth of forage plants and animals. Most of the tree crops established in Uruguay are constituted by high density plantations, destined for pulp or solid wood production, conditions that restrict the quantity and quality of photosynthetically active radiation available for the understory environment. Therefore, there is no satisfactory forage production over the years, which determines that the system integration with livestock be only temporary. The objective of this review is to present the knowledge generated in silvopastoral systems that have been established in Uruguay, its critical aspects, international experiences and the opportunities and challenges for research and technology transfer in our country. We highlight the need to create systems planned jointly with the recipients of this technology and other research and development institutions, in order to evaluate the different components and their interactions in the long term, as well as to determine their productive and economic impact at farm and region scale, and properly assessing the environmental impacts.
650 $aBIENESTAR ANIMAL
653 $aAnimal welfare
653 $aEcosystem services
653 $aIntegrated systems
653 $aProfitability
653 $aRentabilidad
653 $aServicios ecosistémicos
653 $aSinergias
653 $aSistemas integrados
653 $aSynergy
700 1 $aBENÍTEZ, V.
700 1 $aSANTA CRUZ, R.
700 1 $aPOSSE, J.P.
700 1 $aBARRO, R.
700 1 $aHERNÁNDEZ, J.
700 1 $aMANTERO, C.
700 1 $aMORALES OLMOS, V.
700 1 $aSILVEIRA, E.D.
700 1 $aVIÑOLES, C.
773 $tVeterinaria (Montevideo), 2018$gv. 54, no. 209, p. 20-33. -- OPEN ACCESS.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
